Reasonable said:
Manufacturers get for the most part delayed visibility to sell through via two main avenues:
Few retailers pass back immediate sell-through info to their suppliers - i.e. sale by sale - although obviously the flow of orders, etc. allows manufacturers to also estimate sell through rates - i.e. how often does the retailer order and how much and what does this reveal about sell through. This is normally balanced to updates from the retailer - I've sold 85% of last week's shipment, etc. and data from NPD, etc. What is often missed is that for the most part, once the goods have been delivered, visibility is within the retailer only, and a time lag is introduced when retailers release summary of performance to trackers, etc. So, the manufacturer can get a pretty good feel of sell-through, but it is based on periodic snapshots rather than what's happening real time. |
I'm not suggesting that they don't have any idea, the regularity of retailer orders and summary reports of the major retailers from trackers should give a fair indication, should they have the resources to compile that data. The issue is if this number would be accurate enough to put in a quarterly financial report over the more tangible, concrete shipped numbers.
There's also the question of why shareholders would care about consumer sell-through numbers anyway? Once they've been sold and the company has been paid end of story as far as they're concerned, why even entertain the idea of attempting to track consumer sales at retail and make their numbers look worse?







