By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
whatever said:

Except she then followed this with the fact that she didn't know what was in the 14th, 16th, or 17th admendents as well as she couldn't name a single recent supreme court decision.  For a self stated constitutional expert, that's pretty pathetic.

The first part is true, but the second part not so much. She couldn't name a recent Supreme Court decision with which she disagreed. Neither can I, as I think the Roberts court has been largely acceptable.