| Bladeneo said: Hmm, replace his insults for the Wii with the 360/PS3 and youd all be saying how right he is :) |
Ok wait, so because people disagree with him they can't say so...what???
That makes no sense. It would be like this scenario:
A person walks into your home and kicks your dog. You of course are angry and say "What the hell did you do that for?" or possibly just skip the questions and attack him to defend your dog.
So then he looks at you and says "Oh sure..get mad about it...but if I had pet him you wouldn't be so upset!!"...
I really hope you understand how silly that was to say. If people disagree they (should) say so, just having their opinions and sticking to them shouldn't be cause for condemnation.
What you were thinking of is hypocracy & double standards. For instance if a game was mistakenly announced for Console A and its fans praised it and then when the correction was made and those fans found out it was only for Console B and they trashed it..that would be hypocracy and show a clear double standard being set forth by those fans.
But in this case a group of people have an opinion and disagree with the article...so when you say "if the article agreed with your opinion you wouldn't disagree" it is not so much a statement of hypocracy but common sense and basic logic.
Ex: If the sky is blue, the sky is blue.
Logically speaking all true statements imply themselves.
PS - Forgive me if I went to far with the explanation, boolean algebra is sort of something I enjoy a great deal...and yes...I know I am strange=P
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
