| MonstaMack said: Worst port? My friends play FFXIII without any hiccups and It looked fine. If anything Mass Effect 2 made the game seem like a distant memory, I don't care what system it looked better on - it wasn't up to par with ME2's epicness. Losing crediblity? Because they want money? Seriously guys, does it hurt so much to see Square-Enix go multiplatform? Is it wrong for other people to get a piece of the pie? I wish people would realize console exclusivity is not the way to go unless someone is lining your pockets. A majority of exclusives are still first/second party - the third party exclusive game on consoles is getting harder and harder to come by unless It's on the PC or Handheld. |
Im going to speak metaphorically here =P...
That "pie" ends taking an extra year to make, and Square Enix have to end up cutting the "pie" in half so it will fit onto Microsofts "stall". Thats quite a big sacrifice to make, the worst part is that Microsoft barely even manages to sell 1/5th of the "pies" that the PS3 sold, especially when Microsoft was unfairly bribing Square Enix for the "pies" in the first place.
Why have the "pie" cut in half and PS3 owners have to wait an extra year for that "pie" when it isn't even worth it? Especially when Microsofts stall isn't designed for "pies" its designed for "cakes (first person shooters)"...if you wanted your "pie" you should have gone to the PS3 "stall"...
^ WTF xD
@ Jarrod
Well, karma's a bitch.
...I don't understand? You are accusing SONY of bribing developers? I highly doubt it, SONY aren't exactly the ones to have money pouring out of their pockets. Neither have i seen proof or even accusations of them doing that. And even in the rarest cases if they did bribe, at least they bribed games they knew their fanbase would actually like and they didn't steal the game / franchise from the opposition. And im sure SONY would bribe to make their console more successful, not to sabotage the opposition.
