Barozi said:
To explain my point of view, I'm being fair and calling the VGC numbers false, but since I personally cannot prove it, I also need to claim the NPD numbers as false, so the most fair step would be to simply look at the average between the two, which IS mathematically more precise than either of the two numbers. But even then there is a best case and a worst case scenario. Average: 237k (NPD - 173k; VGC - 302k) |
I appreciate the spirit of what you're doing, but I don't think averaging numbers for two sources is going to be "more precise" than either source, especially when the numbers have a pronounced disparity.







