Beuli2 said:
Linkasf said:
djstrykermx said:
I just cannot understand when people say that third parties killed the wii, I mean when the good AAA games come along they DON'T SELL. There are many many examples:
1- No More Heroes 1 & 2
2- MadWorld
3- Red Steel 2
4- Prince of Persia (heard the wii version was really good)
5- Conduit
6- Many Multiplatform titles that simply do not sell on the Wii and sell on the HD consoles.
Then there are also additional ports such as the Resident Evil archives games adapted to the Wii-mote which didn't even chart in this site.
Nintendo games sell very well on the Nintendo platform, no doubt. Mainly because Nintendo software usually means quality and people are just used to that.
I think it is a smart business decision from developers/publishers to stop supporting the Wii with those types of games, because if they do not get a return on their investment, why should they care? To please fanboys?
So in the end, to me the blame is on the customers who don't pay for AAA games on the Wii and that have forced the devs/publishers to make those tough decisions of stopping support for the platform all along.
|
Im sorry but those games are not AAA games. OF all my years playing games, they don't stack up to games i've played 10 years ago. No more heroes lasted for a good time and my bro finished it almost 10 times. I heard Resident evil Archives had issues; so how is this AAA again?
|
Maybe those are "good games" only according to the internet guys and actually they're bad games no one cares? I don't know how people keep putting Madworld as a good game, I just don't see it.
|
Exactly. I'm not sure why anyone put MadWorld is an AAA game. I got bored of that game so fast, that I left it unfinished. A good game is supposed to keep a player playing till the end. It failed to do that with me, Not to mention I was almost done with it according to my friends that felt like finishing it (God that game is repetitive and short).
