axt113 said:
I can point to other games from the GCN and N64 era if you;d like, heck I can point to those whole eras as evidence, what would you like to see? Tell me what sales figures you want. Galaxy two proves this second argument false, where was the uptick from galaxy 2, also lets compare Galaxy one or two to NSMB, NSMB ignited sales during last holiday, are you really going to try and argue that my point is wrong? Lets also go back to the GCN eras and look at Mario sunshine and compare to NSMB for console selling power if you don't like Galaxy, why didn't GCN experience the boosts from Mario? So Galaxy no, didn't push any hardware, if you really want to argue that, I suggest you look at GCN and Sunshine. As for the Wii games and Kart, I never disagreed those push hardware, from the beginning I said those were fine, so you're arguing a non-issue, since I never said Nintendo should abandon those games, not once, but as I pointed out earlier those are expanded audience games, I'm not detracting those genres, I agree those genres should be covred by Nintendo, so you're arguing a different issue than what I said altogether. Since I already said from the beginning that those games are fine, go read my earlier posts, those aren't the games that I think should not be in 3D. Since the beginning, my point has been about the core games, read my earlier posts, games like galaxy, Zelda and Metorid and the like. |
Referring to less successful hardware generations as indicative of current trends and varied software environments is fallacious. Try pointing to the Playstation and the Playstation 2, instead.
Galaxy 2 isn't proper as a hardware mover in that it was a sequel and doesn't appeal to more people that the original didn't already appeal to. Try again.
Galaxy was selling during a time that the Wii was already sold out. If you released NSMBWii during that season, it would have had exactly as much effect as Galaxy did. Yes, your comparison - and your point - is verifiably, objectively, completely wrong.
You have given no evidence for Zelda being better in 2D or anything of the sort; do you posit that the series should simply be abandoned?
Let me make sure I'm getting this straight. I know I am, but I'm going to ask you a series of questions. THis is the first, and if you can, keep your answer down to either yes or no:
Do you posit that Nintendo should abandon all games and series that are not "proven hardware movers", which coincide with sustained increased sales?
I'm going to bed. I expect a (brief) answer in the morning, when I will ask my next question.
Humor me.







