axt113 said:
I'm merely using diversity as others used it, I don't like the term much myself, but others said Nintendo needed diversity in terms of the 3D games, I think it was republic who said it perhaps, so I just used it when replying to those people. My point is that Nintendo , doesn't need to bother with 3D style gameplay that doesn't add value, like Galaxy, Zelda, Metroid (games like Wii sports/Wii fit, while 3D do add value so those are fine), but for the most part, that they should focus on 2D style games, like NSMB and oher old school games, in line with the types of games that were available on the NES and to a slightly lesser degree the SNES, and GB/GBA/DS, for the sake of pushing hardware, and keeping momentum. That 3D games like Galaxy, Other M, Skyward, are a waste, and those genres of games should be left to third parties if someone wants to make them |
It's diversity in terms of genre, of which 2D vs 3D is only a single aspect.
2D does not equate to success, nor does 3D equate to failure. Your assertion is inherently fallacious.
