By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lastgengamer said:
axt113 said:
Cheebee said:

Yes, I get that. But he literally called such titles (including Galaxy, which happens to be a near-10-million-seller, how many games can claim that?) 'wastes'.

Also, he's claiming SS is a waste, a title we know hardly anything about and which may not release for another year. How awkward is that, especially considering TP, its predecessor, is one of the best-selling Zelda games ever, and was without a shred of doubt a system seller when Wii launched. And you and I both know there are a LOT of people clamouring for a new console Zelda, let alone a 1:1 motion controlled one.

So, in conclusion, those things do indeed make him wrong. And very much so.

 


Wrong, they are wastes, wastes are uses of resources that don;t add any value, thanks for proving my point that you have no understanding of the business.

 

If the games didn;t push hardware, then they didn;t add value, because consumers didn;t consider them a reason to buy the system, hence they are wastes

Skyward sword will not push console sales at all, so once again I will be right, and you wrong, just wait and see.

 

I find it funny people keep saying that I'm wrong, but no one has given me a reason why, except they like the games, but the fact is, they would have bought the system even without those games, so that argument is flawed


Why wouldn't Nintendo want to appeal to it's longtime fan base as well as the expanded audience? It would do more damage to them in the long run to not try to attract as many customers as possible.


Not really, as long time gamers will still buy 2D mario, 2D Zelda and 2D Metroid which are old school style games