LordTheNightKnight said:
Cheebee said:
axt113 said:
Cheebee said:
axt113 said:
theRepublic said:
axt113 said:
Galaxy 2 sold less than Galaxy one, was not a system seller and sold far, far less than NSMB, that's a flop
|
Really? So Nintendo should do nothing to maintain diversity in its library or cater to massive niches within its fanbase? Sounds like a great business strategy you got there.
|
Massive Niches, lol, what massive niche was activated by Galaxy? NSMB Wii got that Niche and more.
Face i, games like Galaxy, Other M and Skyward are wastes , so yeah, my business strategy would have not only resulted in more sales, but would have kept momentum going
|
You're hilarious. XD
|
No I'm right, just look at the sales, and hardware pushing ability of the games
|
No, you're wrong, and a lot of other people in this thread have already tried to sensibly explain to you why that is. I'm not going to bother anymore if you just don't want to see logic.
|
His conclusion is wrong, but not his reasoning. The game don't sell as well as a lot of the other games, and are not system sellers.
Doesn't mean Nintendo wasted making them, just that they shouldn't have used them as big guns.
|
Yes, I get that. But he literally called such titles (including Galaxy, which happens to be a near-10-million-seller, how many games can claim that?) 'wastes'.
Also, he's claiming SS is a waste, a title we know hardly anything about and which may not release for another year. How awkward is that, especially considering TP, its predecessor, is one of the best-selling Zelda games ever, and was without a shred of doubt a system seller when Wii launched. And you and I both know there are a LOT of people clamouring for a new console Zelda, let alone a 1:1 motion controlled one. 
So, in conclusion, those things do indeed make him wrong. And very much so.
