tuscaniman said:
zgamer5 said:
tuscaniman said:
zgamer5 said:
tuscaniman said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Relax...
Gamesradar - 8
SixthAxis - 8
Joystick - 4/5
GT - 8.1
Game Informer - 7
Kotaku - http://kotaku.com/5659329/review-medal-of-honor
Its a good game...no need to call it "shit" or "bad game". You'd probably enjoy it if you're a shooter fan, unlike me.
|
Yeah those are the best scores it has gotten. Remember when Reach was released and all those 10s and 9.5s started rolling out at the start? Just wait for more 6s and some 5s it will most definately recieve. I predict meta in the low 70s.
|
no need comparing it to reach, compare it to cod, and if this is crap game, then activision are paying millions to reviewers to keep cod from getting 5s and and 4s and 6s and 7s.
|
I'm not comparing it to Reach. I'm comparing the review timetable to Reach's review timetable. Starts out high and the bad ones always come in later.
|
i know, im just saying it seems like you just played reach then tried moh and started bashing about how bad it is. im not saying i dont kinda agree with the score, but theirs no need calling the game a piece of shit.
|
Dude I haven't played the retail release of MOH, I played the Beta. And Halo cannot be compared to a "realistic" war type shooter. If you don't believe me then go buy the game and play it for yourself. And if I believed what I played was a piece of shit then its a piece of shit. I'll change my wording for you sensitive types though. The beta was not good at all and from what I read on this review it has not been changed.
|
i know all of that, im not sensitive :P im just saying no need making a rant about the game. god forget it.
