Kasz216 said:
I'd say cause honestly... I mean, it's not like he stopped any external threats. Every president but Obama had a huge external threat to worry about. Also economically he came in right during the good part of the dot.com bubble. He didn't have anything to do with the bubble and there was nothing that was going to prevent it's burst.
As for Lincoln. He was important in providing black people with civil rights... while simaltaniously taking rights away from everybody else. He illegally suspended haibus corpus and constantly imprisoned people for no reason and raided all media that disagreed with him. Lincoln's main benefit was that the presidents around him were hisorically bad. If he was put in a non-crisis presidency.... |
I find it hard to say on Clinton. I feel it was probably a combination of good luck and good diplomacy.
Also in a non-crisis situation Lincoln wouldn't have suspended Habeus Corpus and etc.








