LordTheNightKnight said:
GTA III used 6th gen specs to create a living city. That was a great use, but also clearly didn't sacrifice graphical detail for it. On the other side, we have Perfect Dark Zero, which was considered an inferior game to the first Perfect Dark, and the improved graphics not being anywhere near enough of a trade off. So maybe I should have qualified in the thread title that I meant specs in the sense of graphical detail, but I didn't have the space for it. So if I hear the RE games on the 3DS actually have some improvements over RE4, I'll give them a shot. If they just ape RE4 again, like RE5 did by most accounts, then they are just using the system to make pretty games, not good game. |
Graphical improvement is improvement regardless. That's why they call it an improvement.
If good enough, it can help improve immersion and create a more fully realized universe visually.. Added details etc.
I see what you are saying and often a quick sequal to a game (or a movie) can be a cash in.. But it doesn't have to be..
Regardless. A game will be better than the exact same game, if it looks better. Atleast, that is my opinion.
Ofcourse. A shitty game will be a shitty game almost regardless of how it looks.







