Underwater pryamids/cities give credence to Noah's Flood

[kowhoho]

sapphi_snake said:

pizzahut451 said:

sapphi_snake said:

pizzahut451 said:

If the story of great flood on mankind for its wickedness is true, why does it matter if the biblical version is wrong or right? The story and the point are true, except for some other details

Funny that you call manking "wicked" and not the deity who killed everybody.

And it's high;y unlikely that any of those stories are true, as people back then had no ideea how big the world truly was (plus, people from different parts fo the world couldn't communicate how they did today, so it's not as if one could know what was going on around the world to begin with).

You're doing this again. I said IF the story is true, im not here to argue if the story is true or made up, all i said that if the actual story is true, than it doesnt matter what version of it it.

Oh and...

IF the story is INDEED true, than the deity (God) can not possbily be wicked, because if we assume that the story is true, we assume that God exists, and that means he cant be wicked because he is omnibenevolenct (perfect goodness). ''Wicked'' is like sinfull, and God cant possibly comitt a sin, since he is above it.

Circular logic again.

Just for the sake of quoting this very important post I will explain what sapphi means by "circular logic."

By saying that the truth of the story confirms everything you know about god, you are stating that God logically proves himself. "God is because he is." Makes no sense.

It's like saying, "I know God is real and perfect because God says so."

A statement of logic cannot prove itself. Circular.