3DS being supported for the specs is a bad reason.

[LordTheNightKnight]

ishiki said:

LordTheNightKnight said:

"What is better?
A great game with great graphics
or
A great game with crappy graphics."

Try not having a false dichotomy. You're implying that the game has no other factors, even art direction.

You're implying that a developer wanting to create good graphics would neglect artstyle.

What I said still applies,

a game with great art direction and great graphics is better than

a game with great art direction and bad graphics

yes, if one dev tries harder in art direction, it can make up for the graphics. Same with the other way around to an extent. But if it pushes both boundaries, it can't be matched.

Also what advantage does a 3DS have over say a DS

3D,
Better Graphics

Why not just support the DS forever then?

Define graphics in this case. Polygon count, texturing, and effects? If so, then I say it would take a system even weaker than the Sega Saturn to make that look bad, as that system and its contemporaries still made some of the best looking games ever.