Is "teabonics" fake?

[Final-Fan]

Kasz216 said:

Final-Fan said:

Kasz216 said:

Final-Fan said:

Kasz216 said:

Final-Fan said:
It just bugs me that sometimes instead of responding to my response you just go off somewhere else, and I have no way of knowing if you
-concede the point but just don't feel like admitting it
-simply have no rebuttal prepared
-consider my point so ridiculous it is unworthy of response
-etc. 

It's generally going to be C.  Not so much ridiculious so much as... doesn't really matter.

IF THE ANSWER DOESN'T MATTER THEN WHY DID YOU ASK THE QUESTION

I'm confused to which question your talking about in the first place.  The "Did he spend many many times over his nations average GDP in a short period of time" question?

That one, I just thought it was silly that he was going to be be able to spend away all that money so fast and also get no value in return for it.

So what you're saying is, you have asked me MANY questions to which you think the answer doesn't matter? 

But no, I will tell you what I am referring to, although in the context of the conversation I considered it obvious. 

(severely abridged, not actual quotes except for first part)
Kasz:  "If you were conned with a forgery... you wouldn't want your money back?"
Final-Fan:  "He would have little chance of actually recovering the money"
Kasz:  "..."
FInal-Fan:  "Well?"
Kasz:  "It wouldn't matter that he wouldn't be able to get the money back"
Final-Fan:  "Then why did you make getting the money back your response in the first place"
Kasz:  "What are you talking about"
Final-Fan:  "GAAAH"

Except, you don't know that he would have little chance to get his money back.  You are just guessing.
Like I said.  I specifically said neither of us are qualified to tell if he could or couldn't get his money back for sure.
I doubt he does either.   Either way i'm sure he'd want to try.
Or if failing that, make the person who took the money pay.

The thing is, when I asked you why you didn't respond to my argument, you didn't say "I think your confidence is unwarranted", you said "it doesn't really matter".  You are challenging me on this now, but you weren't before -- just diverting to other subjects. 

So you know what?  I'm done.  When you're doing revisionist history on something you said like five posts ago (and considering how long this has already dragged on) I'm just not going to do it anymore.  See you next time I guess.