APolitical said:
As is explained each and every time this is mentioned, there is a very good reason for it. Everyone expected sony domination and/or a runoff between sony and microsoft. Nobody thought that the Wii would take off as it did. As a result, there were dev teams assigned to put out quality stuff on PS3 and 360 prior to the Wii's entering the marketplace. Once the Wii's success was realized, third parties began trying to put together quality titles, but the dev cycles on good games are longer than the time that the Wii has been on the market. If dev companies did not have a quality team in place and making a game prior to Wii's coming out, then there will (in all likelihood) not be a good game coming from that company until the length of a proper dev cycle. As a result, yea, PS3 has better 3rd party games as of December 2007 because of the fact that third parties put full development cycles into the games, as they expected PS3 to be a success. Any solid third party games for the Wii are still in development, and/or are rushed out and therefore not quality games, after all. |
Their is only one explanation..
Wii has more games = possibility of more crappy games
Wii is popular = possibility of more crappy games;
Check PS2 games, Check DS games you will find a lot of crap in their library...
