By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
almcchesney on 27 September 2010
Edit Thread
Mr Khan said:
Train wreck said:
Mr Khan said:
Carl2291 said:

I see the excuses are already coming out for this game...

Geez.

At least give it a chance on the market before you start coming up with stupid excuses for it not selling well.

 

I better leave this JAM thread anyway before I get happy that it's cheaper and get banned for "dumping on the Wii".

When you deliberately disadvantage your products, that's no excuse. It's just as insulting as when EA decided, later on, that Dead Space Extraction was only worth $10, after pushing the $50 version on Wii owners *and* blaming them for the title's failure (by canceling Doom Resurrection for Wii and moving it to iPhone), when clearly by their own estimation it was worth only a fifth of that.

In this case you're seeing the same thing. It's straight-up insulting

Its not insulting, its a sound business investment by EA.  Its not EA's fault that Wii owners continue to shun 3rd party titles by calling them inadequate then turn around and cry when they lose exclusivity.

When you're charging 5x more than what the product is worth because you think you can get away with it, how is that not insulting?

 

Lost exclusivity is not at issue here. This is far more vicious.

liscensing fees man, its not like they are non existant.

I dont know what is charged from nintendo but it sounds like its a lot cheaper to throw your stuff up on the psn/xbla. I bet even apple charges less to put it on the app store. Its just good business