Atheism and morality

[Scoobes]

pizzahut451 said:

Scoobes said:

pizzahut451 said:

Scoobes said:

pizzahut451 said:

What religion actually says God lives in cloud???. And while i dont know that my interpretation about my God is true, i know that interpretation about a God living on clouds is false. Is it that hard to understand?? If i can PROVE that there is no God living in the clouds than that interpretation of God is false. And since we know that no one lives in the clouds, we know 100 percent that is false.

How exactly can you prove that when no evidence for gods existence actually... exists? It's all subjective as the actual concept of god is not set in stone.

Evidence about God not living in the clouds?  Uhh, have you ever been in a plane? If you were, did you ever see a God up there in the clouds? Or have you ever looked in the sky?

Again, the concept of god is wishy-washy. Have you ever seen god period? How do you know you can see god with your eyes? How do you know god exists at all?

if God lived in the clouds i would be able to see him. but i cant because there is no God on the clouds. and im not here to prove the exsitance of God, im just sayin that the concept of God living in cloudsis ridicilous and dumb. And my question on Reasonable was what kind of evidence shows that God doesnt exist. Why are you trying to spin everything???

But the same logic I've been using can be in turn used to say god exists (and has been, that being that you cannot know god and he/she/it could take many incomprehensible forms). If the idea of god existing in the clouds is one you can so easily disregard, why is it you are so willing to believe in the entire concept of a sentient god?

And as for your answer to Reasonable, when their is no evidence to support something existing, yet people believe in its existence, I would say it is for the believers to provide the evidence. If someone said they believed in a 50 ft chimeric creature with a lion for a head, a snake for a tail and the body of a horse, I would most definately ask for evidence. In no way could I disprove the existence of such a creature, yet logic and evidence are to the contrary suggesting it doesn't exist.

And lol @ your last post :P