Stefan.De.Machtige said:
Atleast i provide points to say why they weren't fundamentel flaws. Where are your points? A fundamental flaw would mean the segments failed in their task. They didn't break the game or anything. They broke the pace - obviously their task. Why else would they be there? For a joke? Sure they did it a bit to well. But that's not a fundamental flaw. Time constraint is the problem with so many games. Those which were good but could have been great, with a month or two extra. |
There was already a delay for the game in the order of a month; they were not in a situaiton where it was impossible to get extra dev time. THey had the time necessary to present a completed product.
Those segments were flawed in design. They were boring, unintuitive for the pixel-hunting, and broke the pacing of the game without adding to immersion.
They were flawed in terms of design, and executed exactly as Sakamoto wanted them to be.
