Cheebee said:
wfz said:
Kynes said:
What I don't get is why people want it to be perfectly 1:1 accurate. Does we play videogames to be as bad in them than in real life? When I play a tennis game, I want to be as good as Rafa Nadal or Roger Federer, I don't want to be as bad as I'm in real life. Being 1:1 isn't fun, because then 95% of the players here won't win a single point against a virtual Tsonga, or a virtual Nalbandian.
This is why I think 1:1 is a fallacy, and we want to be helped when we play games, because real life is much harder than videogames, and most of the time being real isn't as funny as winning.
|
This is true whether people want to admit it or not. There are some simple, mundane exercises you can do in 1-to-1 and have fun, but when things get more complicated, you're limiting yourself to your real physical abilities. Have fun playing God of War and Tiger Woods golf.
|
Quoted for truth.
|
that doesn't work though, that's like saying "Why would I want my analog stick to be 1:1? I don't want to be good at a game, I just want to have fun"
I mean the move doesn't have to be 1:1, that's like saying the PS3 has to be HD with every single game, because it's superior. I mean the software can be made to not be 1:1, just how you can make a game with analog sticks not be completely precise either, so in reality the move is simply a superior controller than the wii mote even with motion plus, that's like having a PS2, that plays ps 1 games. You can play games not as technically advanced like what's on the wii, but also play more technically advanced games on the move.
