By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Euphoria14 said:

Edge: 9/10  (Strange since it is rated the same as ODST? Further adds to just how inconsistent they really are.)

"Reach is a fine conclusion to Bungie’s stewardship of the series, but that's what stops it from being anything more. Halo felt like the future. Reach is merely a brilliantly engineered present."

http://www.next-gen.biz/features/halo-reach-review?

 

Gameshark: C (50)

"Halo is still a superlative multiplayer game, and with a group of friends, there's nothing quite like a well-tuned game mode or a white-knuckle finish to a Firefight. It's a shame that Halo: Reach couldn't add $60 worth of improvements to it."

http://www.gameshark.com/reviews/3624/p_0/Halo-Reach-Review.htm

Both included on Metacritic.

After extensive time with Reach, I'm pretty shocked at that. 50? I know it's all opinions, but come on.

the gameshark review is a clear fanboy driven review



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...