Squilliam said:
If theres a strong market for a genre then terrible games if they are without direct competion on a system ought to do better than expected. If there isn't a strong market or theres a lot of competition then a good/great game can do worse than expected. In spite of whatever quality you may ascribe to them, most shooter games haven't done particularly well on the Wii especially in light of the supposedly 'better' interface. So until I see otherwise, I will presume that outside of novelty the Wiimote style interface has proved no more interesting in a long term context than dual analogue sticks. |
That assumes the market is for the genre, regardless of the quality, not for good games, that happen to be of that genre. Or are you implying the Wii market is supposed to be scrambling for scraps when starved? That is the logic of your comment, and shows why people like Malstrom, and me, hate this mindset that developers can just wag the customers by controlling the supply end.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








