Slimebeast said:
You assume this and it's a nice theory but there's no evidence of that in the article. The only mechanism needed to explain the observations presented in the article is the one I provided. When it's hot you take your shirt off, when it's cold you keep it on. |
It is the mechanism, but the mechanism will lead to an evolution. You either assume one of two things with this statement if you believe evolution to be false
1. That successful traits aren't passed on from generation to generation, or
2. Regardless of the advantage a trait gives, the survival and birth rates between the unfit and the fit are the same.
Now you say that I have no evidence on my side. I have plenty of evidence on my side. The unfit do not survive, the fit do. This is a fact of life. All traits are hereditary, and only the fit survive to pass on the traits (link). It's called natural selection (it's a famous idea y'know) and it's an extremely well documented process and the evidence overwhelmingly abundant.
Natural selection is clearly at work here, it's blindingly obvious.
Can you prove to me that genes aren't hereditary? Because that's basically the linchpin your argument hangs on.