By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Icyedge on 06 September 2010
Edit Thread
wfz said:
Icyedge said:
wfz said:
 

I don't quite understand what you're saying. Sorry. I don't have any care to compare 3DS to the other systems, since they're not 3D. You'd need to buy a 3D TV to make any of that happen. I was looking at the disparity between glasses-free 3D and glasses-required 3D. The price of 3D TVs being higher isn't really a factor I seem to find important in this topic. Of course it's more expensive than a tiny handheld? All TVs are.

Your comparing the disparity between a 3000$ TV and a 400$ handheld, not between glasses or not. If the handheld would be glasses and the TV glassless we would still look at similar numbers. People are interest in 3D, glasses or not. Though, dont get me wrong, im not saying people would choose glasses over glassless for the same product at same price.

Alrighty. I'll just compare HD TV to 3D TV ones then. Will that count? Looks like people aren't all that crazy over the current style of 3D TVs.

Yes thats count, but my analyze is the way around. I find its amazing that it is so close considering the high premium for 3D. People are really interested in 3D nowadays. Thats a good thing, I really like 3D myself, glasses or not, but I will surely prefer getting a glassless 3DTV one day. Between, im a first day 3DS buyer.