Crazybone126 said:
Part in bold IS the reason, so why are you refusing to accept it. You say you will, yet you are still arguing against it. I've mentioned that was the reason since the beginning. *Cough* TROLL! *Cough.* This argument, could have stopped PAGES ago, but you've insisted to keep it going. |
No, you aren't paying attention to the context of my comments. I'm going off of viper's claim that online is a better sales point on the Wii than local multiplayer, NOT whether this game should have that anymore. There is a difference.
And your "stop living in the past" comment from before showed why you don't get this. Just like Zero Punctuation believes that 2D Mario is somehow obselete, you believe that local multiplayer in FPS is somehow obselete (even if you didn't use those words).
I will throw this down. I will bet a week's ban that Goldeneye will outsell this game, and that local multiplayer, in addition to online, will be the reason.
"Wow. You guys can prove to him the world is round but he would still contest it."
You can't even give me the dignity of addressing my points. I'm asking for proof that I'm wrong, proof that Wii customers want this feature over the other, but they haven't given any. Even ONE statistical survey of FPS playing Wii owners would be proof one way or the other. And that isn't an unreasonable thing, as it talks to customers, not just assuming their tastes without asking.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








