leo-j said: For those that are ganna come in and say "No, it's not, this is as stupid as the "GT PSP LOOKS AS GOOD AS FORZA 3 ON 360" thread.. blah blah blah" or.. " I HAS A PS3 AND 360, UNCHARTED 1 LOOK LIKE SHIT NEX TO GEAR 23 AND 3 LOOK WAY EBTTER(even though the only think they did in gears 3 was up the contrast.. suddenly it looks like the best looking game to a lot of people here..) AND UC1 LOO BAD COMPAR TOO VERY MULTI PLA LIKE FF XIII" but guess what on a graphical stand point U1 imo is ahead of anything on the 360, and I made this thread to be PROVEN WRONG, but CAN I BE PROVEN WRONG?? I DOUBT IT!!!! |
CGI-Quality said: It's a testament to Drake's Fortune's visuals if it's being compared with the likes of games that will be nearly 4 years newer than it. Crysis surely knows the feeling |
***This is all that leo-j wanted, i assure you. Clearly this thread has accomplished what it set out to
It's like this thread i remember where one VGChartz member was going on about how the "ICO series" had overtaken the entire Zelda series or something. He got people arguing over which of the two game series was better. for a game to even be mentioned in the same sentence as such a distinguished and respected series was enough for it to be considered great. But to go and claim it better than that game sereis is just ludicrous, not to mention the whole opinion part of the argument
Same thing here, for someone to say something like UNC1 graphics >> all on X360 , though probably untrue, still puts the game on the map in the minds of people here as a game with supposedly unbeatable graphics. In other words, he's saying "this near 3-year-old PS3 exclusive has better graphics than any 360 game nevermind its sequel! That thing is lightyears ahead of anything on 360"
- Bolded statements in leo-j's opening post: just for us to laugh at, and to open peoples' eyes as to how rational and resonable you really are. Haven't any of you guys been here long enough to know this guy's history with laughably ridiculous posts like this one?