Sometimes, I think people like Leo-J make threads like this and laugh at our efforts to dispute them. There's no prize for winning and the whole thing makes no sense. I mean, everybody knows that technology didn't just stand still since 2007. How are games getting 9/10 or 10/10 in graphics from reviewers if no game ever improved on something released 3 years ago? What have developers been doing all of this time? And despite all common sense--despite the fact that I own U1 and U2 and I still continue to be impressed by the graphics in new games--I STILL fell into this "debate".
And the whole thing is futile. I could put a screenshot of a game designed by Jesus himself that makes people weep at the sight of it. All Leo-J or anybody in this thread has to say is "Yeah. It looks good.....but Drake's shirt is half tucked in." And I'd have to find a game that has A.Better Environments, B.Better character models, C.a half tucked shirt, D.Sully's moustache. There is no way to win. There is NO winning!
And yet, here I am-a 30 year old man looking for screenshots of videogames to prove to a teenager that he's wrong! I should be in bed spooning my girlfriend right now!! Meanwhile, the guy who made this whole thread (which has somehow stressed me out) is probably at some Lady GaGa themed rave party right now. And the sad thing is I OWN UNCHARTED. I'm trying to prove that a game I OWN is inferior to other games I OWN. I can't figure.....how did I......why....wha......
*has stroke*
*dies*
