Sony set to have more million sellers than any console after the move?

[Mr Puggsly]

Euphoria14 said:

Mr Puggsly said:

Rainbird said:

Mr Puggsly said:

Rainbird said:

Mr Puggsly said:

Obviously a Move title would be a title that requires a Move controller.

Only a small percentage of Killzone 3 players will actually have and play with the Move.

The best definition would be a title that was bought to be played with Move, but since we have no way of tracking that, it can't really be used...

No... I don't agree with that at all.

I'm just saying there is a fine line between Move support and Move required.

If I can play a game with a joystick, I don't perceive it as a Move game.

The thing is, in a game like Killzone 3, the Move should be just viable an option as the Dualshock 3, maybe even more so. The only thing that seperates the two is that the DS3 is the default option for many because they don't own a Move. Killzone 3 and SOCOM 4 are not DS3 games with Move support, they are DS3/Move games.

Why are you debating me? I gave you my opinoin already.

If Move support is an option and not required, I don't perceive it as a Move game.

If a game has Move controls then it is a Move game, just like how MKWii is a Wiimote game and not a GC Controller game.

MKWii is a Wii game. Wiimote and GC controllers are just options.

Hence, Killzone 3 is a PS3 game. It has joystick and Move support. Is it a Move game per se? Nope.

If someone told me a title was a Move game I would presume Move is required. If I hear a game has Move support, I naturally presume Move is just an option.

Maybe its just context? But in my opinion a true Move title only has Move support. No joysticks.