Don't expect to experience success when waggling with MOVE.

[wfz]

9009pc said:

wfz said:

M.U.G.E.N said:

9009pc said:

M.U.G.E.N said:

9009pc said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

I also disagree on your golf example I don't see why a person couldn't use a move controller instead of a golf club. the move could not only allow for the game to teach you what your doing wrong in your swing, or how to do it better, not only that you get that and all sorts of other sports and hobbies all for $400 for initial set-up and $40-60 per game. which is definitely a lot cheaper than golf lessons and when you get bored you can change to something else you want to learn.

I'm sorry, but have you ever played golf? Golf isn't like baseball where you can swing in a remotely reasonable fashion and expect to hit the ball well. There is so much precision and minute detail that goes into every golf swing, every single part of your body, and it takes months and years to perfect it well enough to hold your own on a golf course. Trying to pretend to be a professional is impossible.

And the golf swing is made possible by the golf clubs themselves. The weight, the balance, the form of the club, it's impossible to do a correct golf swing without the proper equipment. And trying to do it with a tiny, almost weightless controller....

 

It just isn't possible. A 1-to-1 golf game could never exist, it would be impossible for players. It would be impossible for Tiger Woods himself (discounting his recent poor performance).