Funtime said:
LOL what? In my post that you quoted I state that Avatar has an unoriginal story, and then you use it's unoriginality as part of your argument. What am i missing? You're clearly in the first group of people I mentioned. Those that went into Avatar expecting something that it wasn't. If you were expecting some riveting, totally original story with deep characters, and emotion-stirring dialogue then you were obviously going to be disappointed. If you went in, as i did, hoping to experience mind-blowing visuals, top notch 3d effects, and a beautifully imagined world then you'd have been satisfied. Maybe I'm in a minority, but I try not too expect more from movies than they are intended to be. I don't go into a horror movie hoping for a happy ending, or into a michael bay movie expecting to have my brain exercised the way I would with a movie like Inception.
|
You said the story was good, even though it was unoriginal. I highly disagree with that notion. The fact that this is so much of a ripoff as I said before, stops it from being good at all. Avatar doesn't give me everything I pay for. It hides its unoriginal story in its 3D in an attempt to blind the audience that the story is indeed a ripoff. The fact that this film was nominated for best picture for the Academy Awards shows you how much of a joke the academy is nowadays, and by the way, would lead you to expect that it had some semblance of a good story there, when there is none. I'm sure the 3D is great and all, but that does not excuse blatantly ripping off other material and trying to pass it off as "a breathtaking original world." It's almost as if James Cameron sat watching a mixture of Dances with Wolves and Pocahantas with a legal pad, taking notes of which parts he would use in Avatar.









