Sony Working On 3D TVs That Don’t Need Special Glasses

[Nintendogamer]

tjallern said:

Nintendogamer said:

Sony said Nintendo shouldn't bash 3d glasses with 3DS and now Sony are making 3D glasses free TV... I dont understand them.

so you don't understand that while providing consumers with the 3D technology that is the most feasible solution to be put in their hands at this very moment, Sony still want to develop better and improve existing products for future use? you can't provide tech and continue with R&D? i am baffled that your understanding is so limited, and if you can't understand simple stuff like this, i feel very sorry for you.

Sony never said 3D glasses were their method of choice for all eternity, just right now, this is what works best for a fair price and that ppl shouldn't bash it. because it is one step further in the 3D tech stage and can possibly help 3D adaption at a steady pace. why should someone providing glassesless 3D tech showing on a small screen bash someone providing a tech which uses glasses meant for big screen TVs. that's like Sony mocking 3DS for not having HD graphics because PS3 can do it, they're not comparable on any level.

I bet the 3D experience provided by Sony and their glasses blows that little 3DS experience out of the water, just because the glasses actually have their purpose, for now, for 3D tech in 2010. Maybe not for 3D in 2015, but in 2010, glasses makes a difference in 3D for big screens, in both price and quality.

but clearly you don't understand much...

 

Yeah but do you relaly think  people will spend about $5,000 on a 3D TV,  how can you said that the 3DS lacks the wow factor when you haven't even tried it?  Sony may have never said that 3D glasses were their scene of choise or ever, but I think they think that's what they meant.  Oh and you said why should someoen providing 3D glassless experience on a small screen should bash someone providing 3D glasses for a big TV, they didn't.