OMGWTFBBQ Moment: Court Is Asked to Bar Detainees From Talking About Interrogations

[Final-Fan]

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Final-Fan said:

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Final-Fan said:

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Final-Fan said:

Avinash_Tyagi said:

BenKenobi88 said:
lawl at foreigners thinking the US government had something to do with 9/11.
Tin foil hats for everyone!

There is some evidence that casts doubt on the government, especially at the Pentagon

There really isn't, other than the fact that the exact chain of events is not completely known down to the nanosecond. This is worse than the moon-landing deniers people.

Well actually there is the whole lack of sufficient debris, and the damage didn't appear to be the result of a 747, etc.

I'm not saying that it was or wasn't the government, i'm just saying that there is evidence to cast some doubt

Who says the debris was insufficient, and did they account for some of it being scattered and destroyed, and some of it being lost in the general rubble, and the fact that planes aren't exactly built like tanks in the first place?

And who says the damage "doesn't look like" a plane smacking into a building? And how expert are they on the subject?

What's interesting is while they (examiners at the scene) say that much of the plane was destroyed, they also say that body parts and clothing were found intact, seems a little suspicious that the plane would be destroyed, while flesh and bone and cloth wouldn't, seeing as how flesh and bone and cloth are not as durable as metal.

As for those that question the government's statements well you can find many of them easy enough, just google or search the bookstores, i'll leave it to you to decide whether or not you agree with their views or credentials (theres quite a lot of them that naming all of them would be time consuming to say the least).

What you mean is that not 100% of all bodies and clothing were destroyed, which is not surprising. Recently a guy fell 47 stories yet didn't die; over 99% of those accidents leave the victim a splash on the concrete yet he survived. Conspiracy? No. Just the fact that when lots of things get destroyed, the improbable survival of a little bit of it is not so improbable.

Yeah but when someone falls off a building they aren't in a fiery explosion at temperatures capable of destroying metal, or so the story goes, conspiracy, maybe not, but there is a shadow of doubt

"Shadow of a doubt"? I suppose that depends on the person. Reasonable doubt? No.

In fact, about 10 seconds of Internet research reveals dozens if not hundreds of eyewitnesses:

“I was going past the Pentagon, really inching a yard or so every couple of minutes. I had just passed the closest place the Pentagon is to the exit on 395 . . . when all of a sudden I heard the roar of a jet engine.

“I looked at the woman sitting in the car next to me. She had this startled look on her face. We were all thinking the same thing. We looked out the front of our windows to try to see the plane, and it wasn’t until a few seconds later that we realized the jet was coming up behind us on that major highway. And it veered to the right into the Pentagon. The blast literally rocked all of our cars. It was an incredible moment."

Or are they all part of the conspiracy too?