By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Michael-5 said:
scottie said:
Michael-5 said:
scottie said:
Michael-5 said:

 

What? which comparision in particular? Just saying the PS2 did a lot better...

 

I know, and I'm just saying the PS3 did a lot better than the Dreamcast

 

Both statements are true, neither is useful or interesting.

Dreamcast only had 6 million sellers...lol

It's not a stupid comparision, it's logical. Comparing the console with the most million sellers this gen to the console with the most million sellers last gen. Makes perfect sence, and as we can see the 360 only has about half as many million sellers as the PS2. So if the 360 were to beat the PS2, it would have to double what it's done, which would be very difficult, maybe even impossible.

What is interesting is that all three current gen consoles have more million sellers then the Gamecube (42), and X-Box (50), and that the 360 actually has double as many million sellers as it's predesessor, yet still a little short of double it's sales.


No, I'm afraid you are mistaken. Using the PS2's sucess to make it look like a console that is actually doing very well, isn't doing so is a common way of trolling. 

 

Regardless, comparing the PS3 to the Dreamcast is not a stupid comparison, it's logical. Comparing the console with the least million sellers this gen to the console with the least million sellers last gen. Makes perfect sense