By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Smidlee said:
axt113 said:

Move is a terrible decision, listen to Clayton Christensen father of disruption theory had to say on the issue:

 

Rumors indicate that it is planning on following the first approach, sticking a new, motion-sensitive controller onto an existing console. Our perspective is that this is the worst of the three options. 

While this would be the quickest path to market, it has some real risks. Nintendo’s system has been optimized around its controller. Simply sticking a motion-based controller onto an existing system could result in a highly disappointing product. The controller would remain an afterthought, as opposed to an integral part of the product. 

 This generation is different than the past as both Sony and Mircosoft has stated they have no plans releasing a new console anytime soon. Of course Move and Kinect are add-on yet when both has a change of being a success simply because unless Nintendo planning to release new console there isn't much new coming in the near future.

 When PS3 start running around $200 IMO will be the test of how much Move catches on. The biggest problem for Move at the beginning is  the fact PS3 are still $300.


It won't matter, because a few things will happen, people will say, they can't get Wii sports or wii fit on move or Kinect, they'll say its just a more expensive copy, and they'll say that the games on Move and Kinect aren't as good as the ones on Wii (No Wii games)