Euphoria14 said:
"it was one of the rare exceptions that the PS3 version was actually "superior" to the 360 one, so anybody acting like this is going to happen a plethora of times in the future is kidding themselves." So, did I read it wrong? The way I read it could easily be read the same way, especially with the quotation marks around "superior". If I did read it wrong I apologize, but cut the condescending shit. You don't need to "Spell out" anything for me. This whole thing could have been avoided by you simply saying that your plethora statement had to do with misleading commercials and not multiplat quality.
What I am saying that if a commercial is deemed as misleading, every person involved "could" experience negative backlash, this is why the analyst said what he did. |
I understand where you're coming from Euphoria, but... because this is a rare occurence of the PS3 version being "superior", everyone is damage controlling that fact to divert attention away to what has happened:
THEY USED AN ADVERTISEMENT WITH FALSE FOOTAGE FOR THE 360 VERSION. THE ANALYST IS SIMPLY SAYING THAT SINCE THEY WERE CALLED OUT FOR IT, THERE COULD BE NEGATIVE BACKLASH. NOT THAT THE PS3 WILL SUDDENLY HAVE DOZENS MORE "SUPERIOR" MULTIPLATS. THAT IS ALL!








