ioi said:
cliffhanger said:
haxxiy said:
I think VGChartz (the main site) should not have articles on his own. It is strange to have them released first in a place you can't comment and then have it released again on GamrFeed. Maybe they should just be all released on GamrFeed to begin.
|
I agree with this. You don't need two same articles in different parts of the site. VGChartz doesn't need articles. I never read them from there anyway, and I think a lot of people probably don't either. Just put all the news in gamrfeed.
|
Actually the vast majority of hits from the sales articles comes via the VGChartz homepage. They would just get lost in the gamrFeed mess otherwise so I think it is a good idea to have them listed out seperately and linked to VGChartz. Whether we need seperate article pages or not is another issue - the thinking was to have a more professional version on VGChartz with white on black and no comments to keep things clean and have the gamrFeed version where people can chat and comment. That said, I'm starting to think that the VGChartz links should take you to the gamrFeed article pages.
|
OK. that surprises me though. So, most people go to the article that has no comments. Could be a reason why you don't get as many comments in the gamrfeed sales articles. I rarely go into the vgchartz section because everything I need for the charts is on the hub page, so I miss a lot of articles posted there. But then again I'm only one person.
Yeah I can understand the need for professional looking VGChartz section, but I don't think two articles for the same story is necessary.
@bolded: That might be a good idea.
