dtewi said:
rakugakist said:
dtewi said:
Boutros said:
Well if they can do it, why not? It's very prestigious for them.
And it's a damn good thing that some company are pushing the technologies to the max. Otherwise, we wouldn't be so advanced technologically speaking.
|
Awesome graphics is advanced tech? Since when?
And they can do it. But I think they shouldn't.
|
Honestly, what do you have against good graphics?
I totally agree that good gameplay should come before graphics, but when a game series has already proven excellent game mechanics and gameplay, what's wrong with them pushing the limits in the graphical department?
You'd rather them not put any money into the game at all? If it wasn't for graphics, we'd still all be playing NES.
|
I totally hate when people put words into my mouth.
What's wrong? They're spending an unnecessary amount of money on polishing everything to the last details. These details won't even be noticed in-game. So I ask, why? Why do we need to waste millions of dollars on such frivolous shit?
|
I didn't put words into your mouth, thus the question mark. I just don't understand what you're saying. You started off by saying that you didn't want GT5 to sell and turn a profit. So you want Sony to lose money? But the reason for that is that you don't like Sony wasting money in the graphical department. So you care about Sony's money? You make no sense at all dude.
