im_sneaky said:
|
I won't deny that a bundled game sells better than a non-bundled game, I just don't see that it makes a difference how a game is sold. Same goes for copies of Kung Fu Panda bundled with a 360. The publisher got paid for that game, and the customer got a game. How much the customer wanted it and how much they played it are irrelevant, and the fact that Microsoft subsidized the transaction just means the cost will get passed down to the consumer somewhere else (console price, Xbox Live subscription, licensing fees for other games).
You did have a choice. You could refuse to buy the Wii. The fact that you felt the Wii was worth buying despite the extra money you paid to get a game you didn't want doesn't change the fact that you paid Nintendo money for the game. That's $30 you were giving Nintendo in the form of an increased Wii price that you couldn't give EA or Activision. Their loss, Nintendo's gain.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







