By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 said:
vlad321 said:
Machina said:

No. StarCraft was, StarCraft 2 is not. Here's hoping Diablo III is though :/


I really hope they don't screw up D3. I played D2 for so long it's kind of sad. It was so evil too, I'd stop playing and they'd delete my chars so I would feel obligated to build them all up again from 0.


wow you must be joking. Have you even played the multiplayer? All the people I know who dislike sc2 did so because of the first player campagin complaints form around the net.

I sat each of them down to play the MP and they were all surprised by how fast, clean, balanced, and technical it was. They all remembered sc2 being slower. I honestly can't take your post seriously.

Not joking at all. I have been in the beta since sometime in March or very early April. The sole reason I ended up buying this game was because I was hoping Blizzard would come through on the single-player. Man was I mistaken. Also the Multiplayer is a joke, besides the fact that Battle.net 2.0 is more like Battle.net 0.25 the multiplayer is seriously dumbed down. It comes down to making one big army while defending and attack moving it to the other guy's base. Any time something that requries skill pops up, Blizzard patches it out.

I am also willing to bet both my left and right nuts that whne the expasions come around the Terran's new units will be directly lifted from the campaign units (probably the predator and the diamondback if I had to guess).



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835