Kasz216 said:
From what i've read Kuwait was taking advantage of "Slant drilling" and nobody cared because it was happening to Iraq who nobody liked.
Although I am going to disagree about the Crusades. The crusades were actuallly fought because of resources. Back in the middle ages and really up untill the Potato was introduced to Europe... wars ALWAYS followed the same path.
If you were invaded... even if you won the war. You lost. Because soldiers would take all the grain peasents had and there would be mass famine for everyone not in the war. You'd be likely to lose up to 2/3rd of the population in the areas where the war took place.
There was HUGE motivations to go to war... and even larger motivations to not be invaded. The Crusades used religion as an excuse to export the "pain" while still keeping the benefits of being at war. This can be shown by the later crusades deciding to just focus on italian states and other similiar states in which there was no religous difference.
Actual "ethical" wars didn't start until after WW2. |
Ethical wars were rare, however religious and ethnic wars were not.