By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
nightsurge said:
unknown_soul89 said:
nightsurge said:
unknown_soul89 said:
carlosmp said:

X360 is outselling PS3 right now, ¿what will change that?

I think X360 has more things, like the Arcade bundle, Halo Reach, Kinect, etc.

A month time, the 360 is selling more because they came out with a new model those numbers don't last, you're in denial if you think halo reach is going to sell 360s, anyone who cares about halo has a 360 everyone else sees it for the mediocre shooter it is, arcade bundles have been out for years ps3 still outsells the 360 year to year and kinect lol don't make me laugh 

Insecure about something?

First, no, not every Halo fan has a 360.  Far from it.  I can name at least 15 of my close friends who love Halo yet don't have any current gen console yet.  Anyone who thinks every Halo fan is already on 360 is purely ignorant.  Also, love how you troll it generalizing that everyone thinks it is a mediocre shooter.  It has way more features than current more recent shooters and Halo: Reach is going to expand on that even further.

Second, how can you say the PS3 outsells the 360 year after year when since it's release the PS3 has only outsold the 360 one year so far which was last year.  2005-2008 were all 360 with higher sales.

And lastly, it must really upset you that Kinect is receiving far more interest and way way way more preorders than Move even with its high price tag.  Must be a rough time for you.

Oh and why are you using shipment figures when ioi and TheSource themselves have gone over time and time again why Sony's shipment figures seem to be inflated/off from all the major tracking sites?

 

So why would reach be the game to make them buy it if they passed over a 360 every halo game so far? Logic isn't your thing is it, and halo screams mediocre and the reach stuff just sounds like and probably is marketing hype

Apparently reading comprehension AND logic isn't your thing.  Notice I said they don't have ANY current gen console.  That means they passed them all up.  I'm merely pointing out that there is still a large market for Halo thanks to its highly popular LAN Party scene and still has many potential customers that have yet to jump onto any home console yet.

because ps3 sells on average 9.5 a year and 360 only 8.3 a year if 360 really did outsell the ps3 2005-2008 year to year then ps3 must have sold several million more then 360 in 2009 but since you haven't backed up that statement with anything I think it's safe to assume you don't know what you are talking about 

2005 is a given.

2006: VGChartz Hardware data for the period 01st Jan 2006 to 30th Dec 2006:
Console PS3 X360
Total
1,232,194
6,756,463
2007: VGChartz Hardware data for the period 31st Dec 2006 to 29th Dec 2007:
Console PS3 X360
Total
7,621,891
7,878,345
2009: VGChartz Hardware data for the period 30th Dec 2007 to 27th Dec 2008:
Console PS3 X360
Total
9,381,708
10,645,575

MS is marketing kinect more then move so yes it will sell more on launch but the fact that it doesn't work and has nothing but wii knock off games means it won't sell more then that, and don't pretend we have solid numbers on preorders, they claim it's more and expect half a mil by launch but EA expected mirror's edge to sell 3 million out of the gate, companies expectations aren't realistic lol

Does that include Sony's 15 million projection for this year?  I agree it's not realistic.

The reason I'm using shipment figures is because I know their accurate, I don't know that the tracking sites are accurate, in fact I'm almost positive their not accurate seeing how ps3 is on the market and sells substantially in countries that aren't tracked properly/at all

But we don't know they are accurate.  Nintendo and MS numbers match all major tracking sites, yet Sony's are quite a bit off.  ioi and TheSource already explained this.



I don't know, how much has SONY sold so far? But I'd say probably since ps3 is selling on average 9.5 mil a year, anyone who thinks expectations equal fact or even probability are quite deluded 

We know that the ps3 shipped numbers are accurate, unless you are saying Sony flat out lied on their financial report, which is something I don't even think MS could pull off, Sony's shipped numbers are accurate and as far as I know counted the same as MSes shipped, and I know the trackers aren't completely accurate so yea, you are trying to claim their numbers aren't accurate because it doesn't match the trackers when we know the trackers aren't 100% accurate, thats incredibly flawed logic