| Mojo said: They will have better 3rd party support if they have graphics and an online network similar to Sony and Microsoft. Deveoppors don't want to make two versions of every game (ie. hi-def and low-def). It takes too much time and if the low-def version doesn't sell well, it isn't worth their time. I also think developpers will be more willing to make quality Nintendo exclusives if they know they can make more money by selling their multi-latform titles on 3 consoles instead of 2. |
That's BS, because logically it would be even cheaper to just make games exclusively for the Wii. And don't tell me gamers wouldn't have flocked to that system if there had been a flood of major games.
Developers just have a problem making games for Nintendo systems, period, and holding back major games from the Wii just them wanting to avoid it. The specs only mattered when it came to games that actually were put on the Wii.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
