| Ssenkahdavic said: Unless evidence comes out that Iraq was planning on cutting off the supply after the 2002 year (and there is not any I am aware of) I do not see how we went to war just for oil. If we did, wouldnt our supply SINCE the war be greater if not equal to what it was before the war? |
THERES NO OIL LEFT. We're at peak oil already.
Thats a pretty good reason in my view, but again, OP go find out for yourself please.
edit - @Slime - Cmon man, Why are you so paranoid? Its pretty simple really. NO EVIDENCE = CRIMINAL ACT ACCORDING TO UN RULES OF WAR
@Squirrel - So one "leftwing" media company convinced the "rightwing" government to invade a country illegally, kill up to a million people and destabilize the middle east indefinitely for ratings? WOW, thats a good theory.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
