By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Severance said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Severance said:
LordTheNightKnight said:

"how did they allow this to release? =s"

Nintendo is not going to just restrict games again, since that made developers leave them. So that's why.


They resticted games for being offensive or have some nudity , so why not restrict games for being downright awful ?


If third parties made better games, these wouldn't stand out so much. You think the PS1 and PS2 were free of this?

No , but that was when games were very basic, and internet wasn't so common.

PS i am not dissing Nintendo, just  at this game, don't get too worked up.


I'm just stating that the crap wouldn't stand out so much of third parties did their job and flooded the Wii with major games as they are with the HD systems, not making bullshit about "test games". That isn't to you. It's to them.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs