Rath said:
Smidlee said:
Slimebeast said:
Rath said:
Planarian, cup shaped eyes (step 2)
I'm fairly sure all of those creatures are 'living fossils' which haven't changed much since the Cambrian period actually, in any case they provide the small steps you were asking for.
|
But why hasn't that worm's eyes evolved further since the Cambrian age? Doesn't he want to see better? 
|
Statis (no evolving eyes) including living fossils is also evidence of evolution. everything is evidence of evolution which is a fundamental problem. ToE tries to explain both "A" and "Not-A" at the same time. With such a big target you can't miss. In reality the fossil record does not support ToE so the evidence has to be forced to fit the theory.
|
You mean stasis?
Also the reason the worm hasn't evolved further is due to a lack of environmental pressure. Worms that have better eyes do not have a higher chance of survival than worms without them so therefore the eyes do not change.
Also I'm done with this topic, you're claiming all the evidence has been shoehorned to fit everything, you clearly have no respect for science so theres no real point arguing it with you.
|
I came to the same conclusion. I'm not sure if he reads scientific articles and just doesn't understand them fully or if he genuinely understands the material but disregards it until he finds random out of context quotes to fit in with his own viewpoint or both.
