| Smidlee said: Yeah , the Big Bang is like a balloon full of hot air. The more hot air the bigger the bang. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/big-bang-universe-beginning-100319.html From the article: "I would say that there is 100 percent consensus, really," Consensus does not count as evidence for God but it sure does when it comes to the Big Hot Balloon theory. "It means everything and anything that can happen, will," Steinhardt told SPACE.com. "So basically everything could be a prediction of inflation. This to me is a fundamental problem and we don't know how to get away from it." Wow you can't miss when your target is as big as the universe. A funamental problem - you think. |
You love to take things out of context. You did in the other thread on evolution too. Also in the same article
"There is overwhelming evidence [for the big bang] – all of the predictions are true."
Fact is that there is evidence that supports the big bang theory. If new evidence is discovered then the theory will be revised, changed, altered or new ones created etc. On the other hand there is no evidence for the existence of god or a creator being. With the evidence available, which is the more logical to believe in at this point?
