| Jereel Hunter said: There are also a few of us who spent many years playing SC and WC3 on battle.net, and gladly trade what's lost, for the very good matchmaking system. Those like me, log on for 1 reason - to play SC2. Sometimes I play solo, sometimes I play with friends, and you can now get a fair even match faster than EVER before. For those of us who like to just play, not waste our time in chat rooms (because there aren't enough available on the internet?) Battle.net 2.0 is great.
Also, LAN was a feature of SC, it never was a part of battle.net. But it's included in complaints against battle.net because battle.net is now the only way to have multiplayer games. |
So you want a game with less functionality and with less potential to be what others were? Good job, I hence award you the "sheep of the month" award.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835
