Playstation 2 in 2nd place This Gen!

[joeorc]

daroamer said:

WilliamWatts said:

Reasonable said:

WilliamWatts said:

Sony probably cut the PS2's life short a year too soon. They probably ought to have released the PS3 in 2007!

Actually, if the strong push for HD DVD and the rushed release of the 360 hadn't forced their hand, I think the PS3 would have released later.  I don't think Sony had the initial production and costs where they really wanted it when they launched PS3, particularly in US and Japan.

The PS2 was selling fine and without the external factors they had no real need to launch when they did - and I doubt at the time they were really worried about the Wii, although of course with hindsight we know they should have been.

They probably figured all they had to do was show up to win. So why not take away the format war at the same time? :-p Though in any case I doubt that HD-DVD would have won even if the PS3 had been delayed. Sony's reputation with the PS2 and their own movie studios pretty much sealed that deal.

That's actually not true.  HD DVD was handily outselling Blu-ray until the launch of the PS3.

umm. no Blu-Ray had 3 year's worth of sales even before the HD DVD finaly hit the market. Blu-Ray was already on the market being sold to the consumer since apr 10 2003.