Hyruken said:
That is like comparing say a product with a billion people who can buy it against one with only a few hundred thousand who can buy it. If a product is limited to only specific areas how can you compare it to one that is available everywhere. Is it really an achivement for the one to be available everywhere to beat one that isn't? Ok let me put this in simpler terms for you. If you are comparing the 360 sales with PS2 sales then what are the factors for comparing. If you are comparing worldwide sales of both consoles from the momment the 360 was released in 1 country then his data is correct. But by that logic it is not much of a comparison because as pointed out your comparing 1 console available to every country against 1 that is available in only 1 country. What is more likely to have higher sales? The only way you can compare the two in a fair way is to compare sales of the two consoles from the point 360 released in each individual region and work each regions totals out. Take europe for example. You can only compare PS2 numbers to the 360 numbers AFTER the 360 has released there. Because otherwise your comparing PS2 data against no 360 data. Again that would be false data. The same goes for every country that has had a 360 release. You can only compare PS2 data AFTER the 360 has released there. That was the point of his post, to say PS2 has outsold 360 since the 360 has been released. Which is correct. Because if you compare it from the day it was released in americas your have his numbers. But those numbers are comparing one product available in all regions to one only available in one. Not much of a comparison is it. To get the true figures you have to look at each region individually and base the numbers in those places AFTER the 360 has released there. Because your way of doing it as i have explained to you is comparing say PS2 numbers in regions where the 360 had yet to even be released yet. If your going to for example collect data from India and base the comparison on how the PS2 has sold since 360 has launched. You would only use data from after the 360's launch there. You can't include a whole years worth of PS2 sales prior to 360 even being released. That is false data. |
see the point is the data it being done when the xbox360 first's hit the market..did that same point of ref. stop VGChartz listing both the xbox360's sales Data over the PS3 before it was released a year before the PS3 was released?, no so why should it be done in the case of the xbox360?
to be fair?
What your saying is if the xbox360 never get's released in a certain region , but another system does you have to exclude the Data..which like i stated is not accurate..it's being Bias..that's like saying a car company and another car company both release new car's but only one of them releases in another country, you cannot exclude that other country's data .
this is not any way unfair
He only used the data that was since the XBOX360 was released
it's not Sony's fault that Microsoft does not release the xbox360 in as many countries World Wide as Sony does with the Playstation Product's.
were going to keep going back n forth over this, while i completely understand your position, I happen to not agree with it. And I gave my point well enough in my post.

I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.







